Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:11:20 -0500 with message-id <20071229051120.GA27950@connexer.com> and subject line Bug#458108: qa.debian.org: Package's arch list repeated multiple times has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: qa.debian.org: Package's arch list repeated multiple times
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@connexer.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:28:10 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20071228172810.14898.44681.reportbug@miami.connexer.com>
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano, I have not been able to find another pacakage that exhibits this same behavior in its PTS page, but I am proceeding with the bug report. It appears that sometimes the arch listing as repeated several times, as in [0]. My best guess at a cause is that it happens when a source package produces multiple binary packages and *all* the binary packages contain the exact same architecture list (and that list is not any or all). For example, many libraries have a corresponding -doc package which is architecture all, so none of the other libraries I have looked at have had this problem. I apologize for not being able to find another example of this problem. Regards, - -Roberto [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/ddccontrol.html - -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHdTIq5SXWIKfIlGQRAoR4AKCSk203SflGVneDDfK7SSF5Bqw9OQCfdAE9 Bbzsy43xW5Nx7X0DQlVvc4U= =o1gS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Cc: 458108-done@bugs.debian.org, zack@debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#458108: qa.debian.org: Package's arch list repeated multiple times
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:11:20 -0500
- Message-id: <20071229051120.GA27950@connexer.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>, 458108-done@bugs.debian.org, zack@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071229050637.GC19479@zulo.hadrons.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20071228172810.14898.44681.reportbug@miami.connexer.com> <[🔎] 20071228181606.GA10882@takhisis.invalid> <[🔎] 20071228182644.GA9588@connexer.com> <[🔎] 20071229050637.GC19479@zulo.hadrons.org>
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:06:37AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 13:26:44 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:16:06PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > $ apt-cache showsrc ddccontrol|grep Architecture > > > Architecture: i386 amd64 ia64 alpha arm i386 amd64 ia64 alpha arm i386 amd64 ia64 alpha arm i386 amd64 ia64 alpha arm > > > > I can fix the PTS to avoid showing duplicates, but I must say I'm > > > inclined to delay the fix and let you check whether the apt-cache > > > behaviour is correct or we have a bug in something more important than > > > the PTS here ... > > > > > > What do you think? > > > I agree that the data should not be reaching the PTS in that form to > > begin with. > > This was due to a bug from an old dpkg-source, just rebuilding the > source package will fix this. > > regards, > guillem Guillem, Thanks for the tip. That package was built over six months ago, so the bug was probably fixed long ago. Right? Stefano, I am closing this bug report. However, I don't think it would hurt to work around this particular problem in the PTS code in case more bad data were to get in somehow. Though, I would not think that spending too much effort on it would be worth it, so only fix it if it can be done quickly and easily. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.comAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---