[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#452905: Reopen/Reassign: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)
To
:
452905@bugs.debian.org
Cc
:
control@bugs.debian.org
Subject
: Bug#452905: Reopen/Reassign: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)
From
: "A. Costa" <
agcosta@gis.net
>
Date
: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:35:06 -0500
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
20071217223506.dc24bf1b.agcosta@gis.net
>
Reply-to
:
agcosta@gis.net
,
452905@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to
: <handler.452905.D452905.119775651425628.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
References
: <20071215220832.GA3538@df7cb.de> <20071125184800.2eb32c32.agcosta@gis.net> <handler.452905.D452905.119775651425628.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
reopen 452905 ! reassign 452905 bugs.debian.org thanks Is this right pseudo-package for this bug?
Reply to:
debian-qa@lists.debian.org
A. Costa (on-list)
A. Costa (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Processed: Reopen/Reassign: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)
From:
owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Prev by Date:
Processed: Reopen/Reassign: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)
Next by Date:
Bug#429883: Please display if the maintainer is in LowThresholdNmu
Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#456697: xmms-coverviewer: should this package be orphaned?
Next by thread:
Processed: Reopen/Reassign: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)
Index(es):
Date
Thread