On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:17:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > You should probably define "cleaning up oldlibs" more precisely. > I doubt that it is possible to remove oldlibs completely and thus > it would make sense to specify which old libraries should be > removed (as Lenny release goal). In general I agree with your atempt. Thanks. I think I'll mail debian-devel and define the purpose clearly. > Ups, before you file bugs you should announce mass bug filing, right? > Moreover if you check BTS, please check that the actual bug is not > yet filed (hint: merge 456137 370822). Probably missed it. Sorry. > I also would like to vote for filing bugs as severity "wishlist" > because (as far as I know) there was not even a discussion rather > than a decision whether it is a release goal or not. Definitely. I am downgrading every one of them to wishlist for now. > So nothing against your QA effort but I would think your action > was slightly to quick. ;-) Actually, too quick. But I guess this is my first attempt, so you can pardon my errors. I shall abstain from filing any more, before I clarify my point further. > Kind regards and thanks anyway for detecting a potential problem Thanks for the gentle warning. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature