Re: Intend to NMU the cruft package
Martin Quinson wrote:
> the cruft package is in a rather sorry state, with no version in more than
> 2 years, and a whole bunch of easy to fix bugs. Some of them greatly
> reducing its usability while others hinder the whole debian installation
> process (interactive post-inst script).
> I proposed my help on 26 Apr 2005 and 17 Jan 2005, and still wait for an
> I don't really know what to do now. I don't want to become annoying, but I
> think that if you don't prevent me by at least answering one of my mails
> one day, I'll upload an NMU fixing non-RC bugs in a while.
> So, yeah. Please tell me what you think of cruft, of co-maintainance, of
> NMU or whatever. Please.
I think you should hijack it. The maintainer is not maintaining it.
This space intentionally left blank.