Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Schorpp wrote:
| hi all,
|
| as i see you try to maintain quality in debian efficently.
|
| ive been thinking for months now about inventing and adopting
| the SPI-standards cmm(x), spice, iso12207, and iso 9001,
| etc, in free sw's lifecycles
| and would like to ask you about comments and discussion.
|
| discussion/research points:
|
| 1. closing and improving the spi/qm/qa- cycle with the developers by
| analyzing their dev-processes, tools, configuration/analysis mngmnt and
| give non-demotivating feedback with
|
| -what i call now- "CMP" ( Capability Maturity Points), scale 10-100
| (log).
|
| the classic industry way has shown up to be demotivating, developers
| would avoid the system or even trick it off.
|
| 2. escape the megawave of developer->feature->bug->developer bad cycles
| by targeting q-lacks at the beginning of a lifecyle leaving no stage
| uncovered, just building a dam against the bug-hazard at the end
| and maintaining old waterfall structures has shown up no more
| sufficent -UNDEPENDENTLY- of the size and amount of sw-project(s).
|
| 3. research, collect and provide "best practices", not just scales.
|
4. invent software metrics for oss like function/class points.
| . . .
|
|
|
| y
| tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.90 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQYZVhmqsze5HSzyoAQKtkgQA44aifNr0YpgJLZb5j2GYX4MxHhIXoZlm
y7lbavuAyRwU1xMImGsIhZGdxdRXoIQ5HTu23pwmODxM+/SKIgjRasxFxPbULh5i
fSyrX9nAY2fgFkVSM/daH/M4SMObKZsda6U0RG15rCEhHxaCMjcpooh4kg6Xyhrz
kb01U9XMN2E=
=DKdY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: