Re: Removing mindi?
* Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> [2004-01-27 17:31]:
> No. I was just pointing out that removing package B on which package A
> depends does not make it necessarily "obvious" (as you said) that
> package A has to be removed as well.
Yeah, okay, s/obvious/easy/ (solution) then.
> Consider for example the latex2html case, where nobody claimed as
> "obvious" that packages having a build-depends on latex2html should
> be moved automatically to non-free.
Well, that's obviously [:-)] a different situation. ;-)
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: