Re: Mico-2.3.5 bug #104701
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:15:28PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:03:04AM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> > that upstream refuses to fix. In fact I don't know if anything actually uses
> > this pacakge any more.. maybe it can just be removed?
>
> Reverse Depends:
> mico-bin,libmico2.3.5
> libmico-dev,libmico2.3.5
> Dependencies:
> 2.3.5-2 - libc6 (2 2.2.3-1) libmico2.3.3 (0 (null))
>
> So I think it can go. Will you request its removal? Since we have
> three other ORBs (Orbit, OmniOrb and TAO) still, I doubt many people
> will miss it :-)
>
> --
> Revolutions do not require corporate support.
I agree.. I don't think anyone will miss it much.. the upstream packaging is
pretty bad too, I say just get rid of it.
--
Stephen
Reply to: