[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#47334: marked as done (shhopt: Extra info in debian/files)



Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:31:30 +0100
with message-id <20011112133130.A7275@jagor.srce.hr>
and subject line Fixed in shhopt 1.1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 1999 14:39:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 1407 invoked from network); 13 Oct 1999 14:39:21 -0000
Received: from erwin.complete.org (root@209.197.212.34)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 1999 14:39:21 -0000
Received: (from jgoerzen@localhost)
	by erwin.complete.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id JAA10442;
	Wed, 13 Oct 1999 09:39:20 -0500
Sender: jgoerzen@erwin.complete.org
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: shhopt: Extra info in debian/files
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
Date: 13 Oct 1999 09:39:20 -0500
Message-ID: <87oge38gvb.fsf@erwin.complete.org>
Lines: 29

Package: shhopt
Version: 1.1.4-1

The build daemon reports:

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| sbuild Warning:                                                      |
| ---------------                                                      |
| After unpacking, there exists a file debian/files with the contents: |
|                                                                      |
| shhopt-dev_1.1.4-1_i386.deb devel optional                           |
| shhopt_1.1.4-1_i386.deb libs optional                                |
|                                                                      |
| This should be reported as a bug.                                    |
| The file has been removed to avoid dpkg-genchanges errors.           |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+


You can find the complete log of the failed build for this package at:
  http://www.complete.org/~buildd/logs/shhopt_1.1.4-1_19991013-0916
This is on a DEC Alpha system running the unstable distribution.
Linux erwin 2.2.13pre14 #1 Fri Oct 1 19:44:48 CDT 1999 alpha unknown


-- 
John Goerzen   Linux, Unix consulting & programming   jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade)       www.debian.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The 203,014,750th prime number is 4,289,074,379.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 47200-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2001 12:34:29 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Mon Nov 12 06:34:28 2001
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (mvela)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 163GI0-0005aW-00; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:34:26 -0600
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07721
	for 47200-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:31:30 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:31:30 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 47200-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in shhopt 1.1.5-1
Message-ID: <20011112133130.A7275@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: 47200-done@bugs.debian.org

(Now that shhopt is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed.)

Here is the relevant changelog entry:

  shhopt (1.1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low

    * New upstream.
    * Fixing mysterious bug with debian/files showing up in source.

   -- Ole J. Tetlie <olet@debian.org>  Fri, 29 Oct 1999 18:15:41 +0200



Reply to: