Bug#34969: marked as done (fvwm2: fvwm2: /etc/X11/fvwm2/menudefs.hook lists modules in the wrong directory)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 1999 01:53:25 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <E10PcrF-0000Hv-00@polya>
and subject line Bug#34969: fvwm2: fvwm2: /etc/X11/fvwm2/menudefs.hook lists modules in the wrong directory
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 1999 00:20:42 +0000
Received: (qmail 27292 invoked from network); 24 Mar 1999 00:20:40 -0000
Received: from winch-as2-11.win.org (HELO AeroSpace.fries.net) (@204.184.50.155)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 1999 00:20:40 -0000
Received: (from david@localhost)
by AeroSpace.fries.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id AAA01218;
Sun, 21 Mar 1999 00:23:56 -0600
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 00:23:56 -0600
Message-Id: <[🔎] 199903210623.AAA01218@AeroSpace.fries.net>
From: <david@AeroSpace.miango.com>
Subject: fvwm2: fvwm2: /etc/X11/fvwm2/menudefs.hook lists modules in the wrong directory
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Package: fvwm2
Version: 2.1.10-2
Space:/etc/X11/fvwm2# grep Ident *
menudefs.hook:+ "FvwmId&ent" /usr/lib/X11/fvwm2/FvwmIdent
NoSpace:/etc/X11/fvwm2# locate FvwmIdent
/usr/X11R6/lib/fvwm2/fvwm/2.1.10/FvwmIdent
/usr/X11R6/man/man1/FvwmIdent.1.gz
So the modules aren't found.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux AeroSpace 2.2.3 #21 SMP Tue Mar 9 10:33:23 CST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages fvwm2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.1-0.1 GNU C Library: shared libraries
ii xlib6g 3.3.2.3a-11 shared libraries required by X clients
ii xpm4g 3.4k-1 X Pixmap run-time libraries
Reply to: