Bug#32599: marked as done (ispell depends on ncurses3.4)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:24:22 +0000
with message-id <19990314222421.A17872@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
and subject line Fixed in ispell 3.1.20-0.6
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 1999 18:17:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 6227 invoked from network); 29 Jan 1999 18:17:49 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (email@example.com)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 1999 18:17:49 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (firstname.lastname@example.org [126.96.36.199])
by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02594
for <email@example.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:16:57 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (firstname.lastname@example.org [188.8.131.52])
by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA23983
for <email@example.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:16:56 +0100
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:16:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Debian Bugs <email@example.com>
Subject: ispell depends on ncurses3.4
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
ispell depends on ncurses3.4 (currently optional), but policy says:
"Packages may not depend on packages with lower priority values".
Therefore ispell should be recompiled against libncurses4.
"9adac7dde8e919b4ee5c2550ed93b916" (a truly random sig)