[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#866715: keepassx: KeepassX 2.x shouldn't automatically replace older versions



Hi guys

See https://bugs.debian.org/812110#25
I believe this solves your problem.

Warm regards

On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 11:44:24 -0400 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de> wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> thank you for your bugreport.
>
> On 07/01/2017 02:59 AM, Victor Wagner wrote:
> > Package: keepassx
> > Version: 2.0.3-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> >
> >
> > After dist-upgrade of debian jessie to debian stretch, I've found out
> > that keepassx is unable to open my password database. It suggests to
> > import it from older format, and warns that this action is irreversible.
> >
> > But keepass is cross-platform. Its main advantage over other password
> > managers it allows me to
> > copy password database around between different devices - computers,
> > smartphones, tablets. Just copy as a file, directly, using bluetooth,
> > LAN or USB-cable, without use of some
> > third-party network service (which should be considered insecure).
> >
> > So I have to upgrade all my devices simultaneously if I want to switch
> > from one keepass 1.x to keepass 2.x database format.
> >
> > It is not a decision which could be done automatically for user by
> > dist-upgade
>
> your analysis is correct and your concern is valid. Unfortunately, I
> don't think we are able to address this in a way that you suggest.
>
> The old keepassx 1 codebase is no longer maintained, and Debian as a
> project unfortunately does not have the time and resources to maintain
> it independently of upstream. Therefore, re-introducing the old keepassx
> 0.x version is not an option.
>
> However, Felix maintains also acts as upstream maintainer and I have
> copied him on this email.
>
> Felix, I think it is a reasonable concern from Victor that having to
> upgrade all devices at the same time is unfortunate. Would it possible
> to add support for reading and writing of keepassx 0.x .kdb files to the
> 2.x branch of keepassx?
>
> If so, we can repurpose this bug to track progress on that feature. If
> not, I'd tag it as wontifx.
>
> Reinhard

Reply to: