[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#551690: marked as done (rdflib -- insufficient Python Build-Dependency)



Your message dated Sat, 04 May 2013 19:27:29 +0000
with message-id <E1UYi7F-0003om-3u@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#551690: fixed in rdflib 2.4.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #551690,
regarding rdflib -- insufficient Python Build-Dependency
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
551690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551690
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rdflib
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py26-build-depends
Tags: patch

Hi!

Please note that your package uses either the --install-layout=deb, or
python.mk helpers, but does not Build-Depend on a Python version which
contains those features.

The fix is to bump your python (or python-dev or python-all-dev) build
dependency to (>= 2.5.4).

HTH, and thanks.

Kumar



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rdflib
Source-Version: 2.4.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdflib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 551690@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated rdflib package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 19:42:14 +0100
Source: rdflib
Binary: python-rdflib
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description: 
 python-rdflib - RDF library containing an RDF triple store and RDF/XML parser/ser
Closes: 551690 585325
Changes: 
 rdflib (2.4.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Build using dh_python2 (thanks, Matthias Klose; incidentally closes:
     #551690).
   * Remove uses of string exceptions, no longer supported in Python 2.6
     (closes: #585325).
   * Add ${misc:Depends}.
   * Add build-indep and build-arch targets to debian/rules.
   * Convert to 3.0 (quilt) source format.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 bc69b720520f6789d47b68e29cda40e5a2895abd 1798 rdflib_2.4.2-3.dsc
 8877272437505ec167011e834560b380155ff448 9164 rdflib_2.4.2-3.debian.tar.gz
 cf0e276e0ceead36d02dccc973410170315a9fad 310870 python-rdflib_2.4.2-3_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1838199671217e3b3a88969245b643947017dca6224516ec8400696a306ca2a0 1798 rdflib_2.4.2-3.dsc
 a0536c9197a69dfd9d6816edc9e945de1cd9f45165bab92131b03039c1572951 9164 rdflib_2.4.2-3.debian.tar.gz
 ff5750950afdc58be44dc70cac8d26586502e0e53b68e45d9d973be94811c8ae 310870 python-rdflib_2.4.2-3_i386.deb
Files: 
 7627807f50949a8c889473fd346d6dc9 1798 python optional rdflib_2.4.2-3.dsc
 30d2a1c146b4fe7a889c610dff16b5eb 9164 python optional rdflib_2.4.2-3.debian.tar.gz
 1b0e814203ba0aef63f48380648f0a3f 310870 python optional python-rdflib_2.4.2-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer
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=Hcjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: