[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#593790: marked as done (clojure: 1.2.0 released)



Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:09:56 +0000
with message-id <E1SHvQy-0004L9-Mi@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#668165: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #593790,
regarding clojure: 1.2.0 released
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
593790: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593790
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: clojure
Severity: wishlist

I don't know how much work this is likely to be, and you may have
already seen it, but there's a new stable 1.2.0 release:

  http://clojure.org/downloads

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package clojure has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/668165

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: