Bug#438588: marked as done (Short description indicates that gimp2.0-quiteinsane is just for GIMP 2.0)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:17:16 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1RNhnw-00088h-AD@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#647950: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #438588,
regarding Short description indicates that gimp2.0-quiteinsane is just for GIMP 2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
438588: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gimp2.0-quiteinsane
Version: 0.3-8
Severity: minor
gimp2.0-quiteinsane's short description "A Qt based SANE plugin for GIMP
2.0" indicates that it is not for GIMP 2.2, but it actually works fine
with it. Please remove the version from the description. Renaming to
gimp-quiteinsane could also be a good thing.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.3-9+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package quiteinsanegimpplugin has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/647950
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: