[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#613758: gnome-pilot-conduits-data: conflicts with gnome-pilot-conduits 2.0.17-2

Package: gnome-pilot-conduits-data
Version: 2.32.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I got the following error:

Selecting previously deselected package gnome-pilot-conduits-data.
Unpacking gnome-pilot-conduits-data (from .../gnome-pilot-conduits-data_2.32.1-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-pilot-conduits-data_2.32.1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/locale/wa/LC_MESSAGES/gnome-pilot-conduits.mo', which is also in package gnome-pilot-conduits 2.0.17-2
configured to not write apport reports
                                      dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Preparing to replace gnome-pilot-conduits 2.0.17-2 (using .../gnome-pilot-conduits_2.32.1-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gnome-pilot-conduits ...
Processing triggers for gconf2 ...
Processing triggers for gnome-menus ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gnome-pilot-conduits:
 gnome-pilot-conduits depends on gnome-pilot-conduits-data (= 2.32.1-1); however:
  Package gnome-pilot-conduits-data is not installed.
dpkg: error processing gnome-pilot-conduits (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Setting up libgnome-pilot5 (2.32.0-1) ...
Setting up gnome-pilot (2.32.0-1) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Reply to: