[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#582542: marked as done ((kbiff_3.8-1.1/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess})

Your message dated Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:55:35 +0000
with message-id <E1Pn9a3-000739-M3@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#540212: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #582542,
regarding (kbiff_3.8-1.1/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

582542: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582542
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kbiff
Version: 3.8-1.1
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsmith@debian.org
Usertags: avr32


Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.

Full build logs available:


Bradley Smith

Bradley Smith                                     brad@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer                         bradsmith@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347       D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.9-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package kbiff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the assiciated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/540212

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing

Debian distribution maintenance software
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: