[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#537756: marked as done ((fdutils_5.5-20060227-3/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess})

Your message dated Mon, 10 May 2010 19:29:10 +0200
with message-id <201005101929.11501.mcy@lm7.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#537756: FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
has caused the Debian Bug report #537756,
regarding (fdutils_5.5-20060227-3/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

537756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fdutils
Version: 5.5-20060227-3
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsmith@debian.org
Usertags: avr32


Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.

Full build logs available:


Bradley Smith

Bradley Smith                                     brad@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer                         bradsmith@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347       D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.5-20060227-4

Hi Bradley,

It seems that this problem does not exist any more in the current version of 
fdutils: config.{sub,guess} are now copied from those provided by autotools-

The build log for this version seems to confirm that it works fine, so I'm 
closing this bug:

Thanks for the report,


Ma clef GPG est disponible sur keyserver.veridis.com
My GPG key is available on keyserver.veridis.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: