[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#564940: marked as done (sfind: should this package be removed?)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:07:50 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100124230750.BCE4FB4E3@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package sfind has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #564940,
regarding sfind: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

564940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sfind
Severity: serious
Justification: orphaned, low popcon, an alternative is Essential: yes
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal

sfind seems like a candidate for removal from Debian:

* orphaned
* low popcon (7 votes)
* doesn't seem any better than modern findutils, which is Essential: yes

GNU findutils seems to have the advantages cited in sfind's Description now,
so sfind no longer seems to be necessary?

If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please adopt it and close
this bug.

If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands
to control@bugs.debian.org, replacing nnnnnn with this bug's number:

severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: sfind -- RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, alternative is Essential

For more information, see


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/564940 in Debian BTS
against the package sfind. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/566704. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: