Bug#546198: marked as done (xfs: uninstallable due to logged in debian-xfs user)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:32:07 +0000
with message-id <E1MmHTD-0002f0-HV@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#546198: fixed in xfs 1:1.0.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #546198,
regarding xfs: uninstallable due to logged in debian-xfs user
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
546198: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546198
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: xfs
version: 1:1.0.8-4
severity: serious
the latest xfs update is currently uninstallable on unstable. the error is:
Setting up xfs (1:1.0.8-4) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/xfs ...
usermod: user debian-xfs is currently logged in
dpkg: error processing xfs (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 8
fyi, the debian-xfs entry in /etc/password is:
debian-xfs:x:109:115::/nonexistant:/bin/false
i don't think this had existed prior to this xfs update. let me know
if you need any more info.
mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfs
Source-Version: 1:1.0.8-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xfs_1.0.8-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.8-5.diff.gz
xfs_1.0.8-5.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.8-5.dsc
xfs_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb
to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 546198@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> (supplier of updated xfs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:17:23 +0200
Source: xfs
Binary: xfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:1.0.8-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Description:
xfs - X font server
Closes: 546198
Changes:
xfs (1:1.0.8-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Move the fixup of the home directory name typo from the postinst to the
init script, to increase the chances that the daemon is not yet running
so that we can successfully run usermod to do the cleanup, and not need
to disturb the possible running X session by restarting the daemon.
(Closes: #546198)
Checksums-Sha1:
960ba0270b515f523d9edc6b639871f31721c1de 1147 xfs_1.0.8-5.dsc
7654ebeb3274a45b452510bed2c0f394394de5fc 26280 xfs_1.0.8-5.diff.gz
5dc8d36cfaf43c3980bf9c9ae4fbe7ed8fe0964c 93876 xfs_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
fa950a5839ead8bb5f805e05b9b8f35656a94a472bcc8cc941a858415d72e1b5 1147 xfs_1.0.8-5.dsc
8a13d0a733a8f20a7110279b031a31c7a67eb555620d174458e7bd6471c56422 26280 xfs_1.0.8-5.diff.gz
380c56eaa33ed0cbfd7e7f926713c914c4b0044eec4dd1a7109f99445f620979 93876 xfs_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb
Files:
d38c6e8870d1598ea692377f71a9923f 1147 x11 optional xfs_1.0.8-5.dsc
13f46d0f5c47a199232ab7bffe1072f2 26280 x11 optional xfs_1.0.8-5.diff.gz
91a0baae08002a2c652f222f9422828d 93876 x11 optional xfs_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqq9yIACgkQuW9ciZ2SjJueUwCcCpYj+0lP03DtHCoB1cdhtBoO
5oQAniCTBBaIT8viQ5yTFLjA653xbxCa
=a55H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: