[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#209096: marked as done (dctc: downloads stopped working on upgrade from 0.85.2)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:04:49 +0100
with message-id <1250625889.648304.4874.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package dctc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #209096,
regarding dctc: downloads stopped working on upgrade from 0.85.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

209096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dctc
Version: 0.85.5-1

Debian unstable. Recently upgraded dctc and dcgui from 0.85.2 and 0.73. Suddenly I cannot download. It just says Waiting. Uploads still work. I verified that this is specific to 0.85.5/0.76 by downgrading to the old packages. Suddenly I could download. I'm not sure that this is an upstream (dctc/dcgui developer) problem as I've seen no reports about it on the official forum (http://brainz.servebeer.com/phpBB2/index.php).

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.85.9-5+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/209096 in Debian BTS
against the package dctc. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/334488. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: