[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#502701: marked as done (ld.so.preload-manager: underdocumented)

Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:23:14 +0100
with message-id <1249590194.564807.6953.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line ld.so.preload-manager has been removed from Debian, closing #502701
has caused the Debian Bug report #502701,
regarding ld.so.preload-manager: underdocumented
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

502701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ld.so.preload-manager
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: wishlist

Please add more docs and example code to the package. This is
important since there is a lot to be done wrong with the script and it
modifies things in a very important location.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.27-zgsrv (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.3.3-3+rm

The ld.so.preload-manager package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/377867 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: