[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#536112: marked as done ((snooper_19991202-5/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess})

Your message dated Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:15:31 +0100
with message-id <20090802191531.47cade9b@sakaki.chris-lamb.co.uk>
and subject line Re: (snooper_19991202-5/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
has caused the Debian Bug report #536112,
regarding (snooper_19991202-5/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

536112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536112
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: snooper
Version: 19991202-5
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsmith@debian.org
Usertags: avr32


Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.

Full build logs available:


Bradley Smith

Bradley Smith                                     brad@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer                         bradsmith@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347       D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 19991202-6

 snooper (19991202-6) unstable; urgency=low
   * QA upload.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.2.
   * Move to "minimal" debhelper 7 style.
   * Use quilt instead of "manual" patch system.
   * Move all .diff.gz changes to quilt.
   * Fix FTBFS on avr32 by updating config.{sub,guess} from autotools-dev.

(forgot to add Closes:)


     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: