[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#413300: marked as done (hanterm-xf: installs an alternative in /usr/bin/X11)

Your message dated Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:23:26 +0100
with message-id <1249165406.986927.7754.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line hanterm-xf has been removed from Debian, closing #413300
has caused the Debian Bug report #413300,
regarding hanterm-xf: installs an alternative in /usr/bin/X11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

413300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413300
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: x11-common
Version: 7.1.0-13
Severity serious

Hello X Strike force,

upgrade from sarge to etch fails with

  Removing xbase-clients ...
  Selecting previously deselected package x11-common.
  (Reading database ... 71210 files and directories currently installed.)
  Unpacking x11-common (from .../x11-common_1%3a7.1.0-13_i386.deb) ...
  rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_1%3a7.1.0-13_i386.deb (--unpack):
   subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

# ls /usr/X11R6/bin/
hamsoft  hanterm

# dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/bin/*
hamsoft: /usr/X11R6/bin/hamsoft
dpkg: /usr/X11R6/bin/hanterm not found.

Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large blue swirl here. 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:3.3.1p18-10+rm

The hanterm-xf package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/290919 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: