[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#219859: marked as done (leksbot structure)



Your message dated Thu, 29 May 2008 17:01:22 +0100
with message-id <200805291601.m4TG1MgC011878@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line leksbot has been removed from Debian, closing #219859
has caused the Debian Bug report #219859,
regarding leksbot structure
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
219859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: leksbot
Version: 1.2-7
Severity: wishlist

Hi,
I was thinking that being able to use this database with dict would
surely be easier because commonly used.

seb

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux seb 2.4.20 #1 ven oct 10 18:16:26 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro

Versions of packages leksbot depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.2-9    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2-9+rm

The leksbot package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/391197 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply to: