[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#323540: marked as done (ilisp: fail to install with emacs-snapshot)

Your message dated Thu, 29 May 2008 16:49:18 +0100
with message-id <200805291549.m4TFnI8f011751@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line ilisp has been removed from Debian, closing #323540
has caused the Debian Bug report #323540,
regarding ilisp: fail to install with emacs-snapshot
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

323540: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ilisp
Version: 5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.24
Tags: patch

Since emacs-snapshot enters Debian sid, I decided to try it and found it 
failed to configure, though emacs-snapshot runs well. 

I dig the problem a bit and come to the conclusion that the problem is with 
ilisp, not emacs-snapshot. The real reason is that there is emacs-snapshot 
has emacs-version 22, which ilcompat.el will fall back to 'fsf-18.

The following minimal patch reuses ilfsf21.el for emacs 22. Maybe it's more in 
line with ilisp's way to provide ilfsf22.el, which is almost identical to 
ilfsf21.el, but the simplest is the best.

--- ilisp-5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.24.orig/ilcompat.el
+++ ilisp-5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.24/ilcompat.el
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
 	((string-match "^21" emacs-version)
+	((string-match "^22" emacs-version)
+	 'fsf-21)
 	(t 'fsf-18))
   "The major version of (X)Emacs ILISP is running in.
 Declared as '(member fsf-19 fsf-19 fsf-20 fsf-21 lucid-19 lucid-19-new 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.26+rm

The ilisp package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/284376 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: