[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#379026: marked as done (dcc-milter still looking for S=unix:/var/run/dcc/dccm)



Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 15:28:59 +0100
with message-id <200805051428.m45ESxFJ019089@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line dcc has been removed from Debian, closing #379026
has caused the Debian Bug report #379026,
regarding dcc-milter still looking for S=unix:/var/run/dcc/dccm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
379026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Package: dcc-milter
Version: 1.2.74

It appears that dccm was renamed dcc-milter
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dcc/dcc_1.2.74-2/changelog

but configuring sendmail with the included m4 file has sendmail looking for the socket dccm rather than dcc-milter:

/usr/share/dcc/dcc.m4: INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dcc', ``S=unix:/var/run/dcc/dccm'_DCC_DEF_')'dnl

# ls -l /var/run/dcc
srwxr-xr-x    1 dcc      dcc             0 Jul 19 19:50 dcc-milter

Linux 2.4.19  i686 and libc6 2.3.5-3


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.42-5+rm

The dcc package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/464161 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply to: