[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#143168: marked as done (dfm: does not display .png icons on the desktop)

Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 14:21:49 +0100
with message-id <200805051321.m45DLnB0017088@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line dfm has been removed from Debian, closing #143168
has caused the Debian Bug report #143168,
regarding dfm: does not display .png icons on the desktop
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
143168: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=143168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: dfm
Version: 0.99.7-6
Severity: normal

PNG files display fine in the 'Option' menu, but not on the desktop.

Andy
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux alice 2.4.17 #1 Thu Feb 14 20:51:58 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages dfm depends on:
ii  gdk-imlib1                    1.9.14-1   Gdk-Imlib is an imaging library fo
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-3    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                    1.2.10-3   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                     1.2.10-9   The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  xlibs                         4.1.0-9    X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.1.4-1  compression library - runtime

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.99.9-2+rm

The dfm package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349205 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org

--- End Message ---
Reply to: