[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#294052: marked as done (emacs21: font: i's look like l's)

Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 13:38:11 +0100
with message-id <200805051238.m45CcBr6016906@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line gnome-print has been removed from Debian, closing #294052
has caused the Debian Bug report #294052,
regarding emacs21: font: i's look like l's
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

294052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.3+1-8
Severity: minor

All I know is I am looking at this line in Info:
2.6 `graph' command-line options

and the two i's look like l's. The two i's are:

  character: i (0151, 105, 0x69)
    charset: ascii (ASCII (ISO646 IRV))
 code point: 105
     syntax: word
   category: a:ASCII   l:Latin
buffer code: 0x69
  file code: 0x69 (encoded by coding system undecided-unix)
       font: -urw-nimbus sans l-bold-r-normal--25-240-75-75-p-148-iso8859-1

please reassign this bug as appropriate.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.37-14+rm

The gnome-print package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/465098 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: