[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#464892: marked as done (debpartial: Hard Links / DVD-DL, BlueRay,...)

Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:03:05 +0100
with message-id <200804270903.m3R935mu007406@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line debpartial has been removed from Debian, closing #464892
has caused the Debian Bug report #464892,
regarding debpartial: Hard Links / DVD-DL, BlueRay,...
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

464892: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464892
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debpartial
Version: 0+20030508.1
Severity: wishlist


would be nice if debpartial would also support

- hard links (currently symlinks and copying only)
- aliases for double layer DVDs, Blue Ray disks, HDDVD


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages debpartial depends on:
ii  libruby [libzlib-ruby]        4.1        Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libzlib-ruby                  4.1        transitional dummy package
ii  ruby                          4.1        An interpreter of object-oriented 

debpartial recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0+20030508.1+rm

The debpartial package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/374107 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: