[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#71352: marked as done (Could libglade0-dev depend on libxml2-dev instead of libxml-dev?)



Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:47:48 -0500
with message-id <200804241347.49149.atomo64@gmail.com>
and subject line libglade has been removed from Debian, closing #82212
has caused the Debian Bug report #82212,
regarding Could libglade0-dev depend on libxml2-dev instead of libxml-dev?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
82212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=82212
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libglade0-dev
Version: 0.13-2
Severity: wishlist


Could libglade0-dev depend on libxml2-dev instead of libxml-dev? This
would make it possible to use both libglade and the new libxml library
when compiling.

Thanks,


-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386

Versions of packages libglade0-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev                     2.1.3-10   GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libglade0                     0.13-2     Library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libgnome-dev                  1.2.4-3    The Gnome libraries -- development
ii  libxml-dev                    1:1.8.9-1  Development files for the GNOME XM



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:0.17-8+rm

The libglade package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the remaining open bugs.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/460787 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Raphael Geissert


--- End Message ---

Reply to: