[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#297711: marked as done (New upstream version available)



Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400
with message-id <1208229682.102287.27553.nullmailer@comcast.net>
and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297711
has caused the Debian Bug report #297711,
regarding New upstream version available
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
297711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rtlinux
Version: 3.1pre3-2

This Debian package was released in January 2002, since then new
versions upstream have been released which FSMLabs state in their FAQ as
an argument to not use the Debian packaged version.

RTLinux versioning occurs to be a mess. FSMLabs makes their releases and
a zillion of others make other releases. To me it seems like the most up
to date version is rtl3.2-pre3, does that seem to be correct?

"RTLinux 3.2-pre3 has been available since 20th of April 2003"

I'm prepared to spend a couple of hours helping getting a newer version
packed for Debian. However since I am not a Debian developer I can't do
it all by myself.

What can I do to help?
--
/Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.1pre3-3+rm

The rtlinux package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/365717 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Barry deFreese


--- End Message ---

Reply to: