Bug#397559: marked as done (aspectj: FTBFS: should use the sun-java5-* packages instead of j2sdk1.4)
Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:17:07 +0000
with message-id <E1IMqGp-0001RM-Jw@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#397559: fixed in aspectj 1.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: aspectj: FTBFS: should use the sun-java5-* packages instead of j2sdk1.4
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:47:39 +0100
- Message-id: <20061108084739.GC4782@ox.lucas-nussbaum.net>
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
It is using a build-dependency on j2sdk1.4, which could probably be
replaced by one on sun-java5-jdk. It would allow the package to build
without requiring non-packaged software.
About the archive rebuilt: The rebuilt was done on about 30 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a chroot containing an etch i386
environment (not unstable). Internet was not accessible from the build
nodes. The builds were processed as root, in a clean chroot environment.
The Grid'5000 project aims at building a highly reconfigurable
experimental Grid platform gathering 9 sites and featuring a total of
5000 CPUs. Its main purpose is to serve as an experimental testbed for
research in Grid Computing. To learn more about Grid'5000, read
| Lucas Nussbaum
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: email@example.com GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aspectj, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to firstname.lastname@example.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
Thomas Girard <email@example.com> (supplier of updated aspectj package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing firstname.lastname@example.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:16:17 +0200
Binary: aspectj-doc aspectj
Architecture: source all
Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers <email@example.com>
Changed-By: Thomas Girard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
aspectj - A seamless aspect-oriented extension for Java
aspectj-doc - documentation for aspectj
Closes: 286087 352521 397559
aspectj (1.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New maintainer. Closes: #352521.
* New upstream release. Closes: #286087.
* AspectJ 5 builds cleanly with gcj. Closes: #397559.
* Bump debhelper level to 5.
* Convert debian/rules to cdbs.
* Build manpages from the DocBook documentation.
* Install wrapper scripts for ajdoc, aj, and aj5.
* Add XS-Vcs-Svn and XS-Vcs-Browser fields to debian/control.
* Update debian/copyright.
ba8adcc6952c25d752af214c1411e897 995 contrib/devel optional aspectj_1.5.3-1.dsc
39c2b1b596f3752ecc58b3c7d193369d 31301441 contrib/devel optional aspectj_1.5.3.orig.tar.gz
711abd1195ed222126545e2cd6d7b09e 13431 contrib/devel optional aspectj_1.5.3-1.diff.gz
7bf0a7b9aa6d798294ecf97bb0d39d81 9981132 contrib/devel optional aspectj_1.5.3-1_all.deb
0d6db1d06e11308548f24d97919b5719 1053048 contrib/doc optional aspectj-doc_1.5.3-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---