[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#376159: marked as done (open21xx: FTBFS: syntax error [arm, s390, powerpc])

Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:47:06 +0000
with message-id <E1IKYO2-00088G-6g@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#376159: fixed in open21xx 0.7.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: open21xx
Version: 0.7.5-1
Severity: serious

open21xx fails to build from source:

| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/open21xx-0.7.5/ld21'
| /usr/bin/make -C ez21
| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/open21xx-0.7.5/ez21'
| cc -g -I ..   -c -o ez21.o ez21.c
| cc -o ez21 ez21.o -lelf
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/open21xx-0.7.5/ez21'
| /usr/bin/make -C elfdump
| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/open21xx-0.7.5/elfdump'
| cc -I.. -g   -c -o elfdump.o elfdump.c
| cc -o elfdump elfdump.o -lelf
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/open21xx-0.7.5/elfdump'
| /usr/bin/make -C verify21
| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/open21xx-0.7.5/verify21'
| yacc -d -v -o verify21-grammar.c verify21-grammar.y
| cc -g -DYYDEBUG   -c -o verify21-grammar.o verify21-grammar.c
| cc -g -DYYDEBUG   -c -o verify21-lex.o verify21-lex.c
| cc -o verify21 verify21-grammar.o verify21-lex.o
| ../as21/as218x -o 218x.o -dv 218x.dsp | ./verify21
| filename.dat:5:1: Syntax error reading data file
| filename.dat:5:2: syntax error
| make[2]: *** [check8x] Terminated
| make[1]: *** [build_all] Terminated
| make: *** [build-stamp] Terminated
| Build killed with signal 15 after 150 minutes of inactivity
| ******************************************************************************
| Build finished at 20060624-2057
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


History tends to exaggerate.
		-- Col. Green, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.4

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: open21xx
Source-Version: 0.7.5-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
open21xx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/o/open21xx/open21xx_0.7.5-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/open21xx/open21xx_0.7.5-4.dsc
  to pool/main/o/open21xx/open21xx_0.7.5-4_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 376159@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated open21xx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:28:29 +0200
Source: open21xx
Binary: open21xx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
 open21xx   - A tool suite for Analog Devices ADSP 21xx family DSPs
Closes: 376159
 open21xx (0.7.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
   * QA upload.
   * as21/cpp.c: Don't assume char is signed.  Thanks to Michel Daenzer for
     debugging this.  Closes: #376159.
 a54b41adac3ed45b0c66e6158fba7abd 599 electronics optional open21xx_0.7.5-4.dsc
 d370af48fe1131a75fa1124cbffd85cf 3433 electronics optional open21xx_0.7.5-4.diff.gz
 ad7cb0dde1f4fb46210b79212800e646 145000 electronics optional open21xx_0.7.5-4_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: