[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#346662: marked as done (dfm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100
with message-id <87acdnzaap.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Fixed in dfm 0.99.7-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:35 +0000
>From dato@net.com.org.es Sun Jan 08 17:38:35 2006
Return-path: <dato@net.com.org.es>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([] helo=chistera.yi.org)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EvlzW-0000nA-6p
	for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:35 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
	  id 1Evlyz-0006kU-Vl
	  for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <adeodato-massbug-xlibs-dev@debian.org>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: dfm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E1Evlyz-0006kU-Vl@chistera.yi.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: dfm
Version: 0.99.7-7
Severity: serious


  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from

    [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

    [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

    [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

    [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org

Received: (at 346662-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 07:13:43 +0000
>From mvela@irb.hr Sun Jan 22 23:13:43 2006
Return-path: <mvela@irb.hr>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([] ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F0vtW-0004aY-PU; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:13:43 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0N7DKXX031327;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:20 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0N7DYrr026516;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0N7DYPS026514;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 193484-done@bugs.debian.org, 268501-done@bugs.debian.org,
        277214-done@bugs.debian.org, 346662-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in dfm 0.99.7-8
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100
Message-ID: <87acdnzaap.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: dfm
Source-Version: 0.99.7-8

Now that dfm is orphaned, NMU-fixed bugs can be closed.
The original .changes file follows.

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:03:52 +0100
Source: dfm
Binary: dfm
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.99.7-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
 dfm        - Desktop-File-Manager for X11
Closes: 193484 268501 277214 346662
 dfm (0.99.7-8) unstable; urgency=low
   * QA upload.
   * Orphan package, as maintainer asked for it in
   * debian/control: Replace dependency on xlibs-dev (Closes: #346662)
   * debian/control: Update description (Closes: #277214, #268501)
   * Install .mo files (Closes: #193484)
   * Housekeeping:
     + debian/rules upadte to dh 5.
 a441b011dcf7a9f81ed7cccf5c565dfa 663 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-8.dsc
 62f83e795d866b02d39014afb0018707 3321 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-8.diff.gz
 db799e24ef1828a4ba68589664769ace 255332 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-8_powerpc.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: