[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#306903: marked as done (zope-mysqlda: Blob support broken)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
with message-id <87zmnoaveg.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2005 09:08:33 +0000
>From debian.box@krachbumm.de Fri Apr 29 02:08:33 2005
Return-path: <debian.box@krachbumm.de>
Received: from bespin.nevarsin.de (bespin) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DRRU9-0004S9-00; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 02:08:33 -0700
Received: from dk by bespin with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRRU3-0007Pp-Bm
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:08:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Daniel Knauth <debian.box@krachbumm.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: zope-mysqlda: Blob support broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:08:27 +0200
Message-Id: <E1DRRU3-0007Pp-Bm@bespin>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: zope-mysqlda
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: normal

Blobs are not usable from Zope due to changed behaviour of python2.2-mysqldb.
See http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2005-February/156947.html for 
a detailed description including a one-line fix.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-bf2.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages zope-mysqlda depends on:
ii  python2.2                    2.2.3dfsg-1 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python2.2-mysqldb            1.1.6-1.2   A Python interface to MySQL
ii  zope                         2.6.4-1.7   open source web application server

-- no debconf information

Received: (at 306903-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 05:13:54 +0000
>From vela@debian.org Mon Nov 28 21:13:54 2005
Return-path: <vela@debian.org>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([] ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EgxoQ-0004ym-3w; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:13:54 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT5Dawf031809;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:36 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT5DhVi005527;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT5DhxD005525;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 132940-done@bugs.debian.org, 298909-done@bugs.debian.org,
        306903-done@bugs.debian.org, 340338-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
Message-ID: <87zmnoaveg.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

zope-mysqlda has been removed from Debian after being orphaned for 3
months.  Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/312877> for details.

Reply to: