[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#248960: marked as done (zope-cmfworkflow: not allowed to access getPermissionsText)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:53:44 +0100
with message-id <87y838caw7.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2004 06:29:13 +0000
>From vitalyo@mail.ru Thu May 13 23:29:13 2004
Return-path: <vitalyo@mail.ru>
Received: from (mail.ru) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BOWC0-0002De-00; Thu, 13 May 2004 23:29:13 -0700
Received: (qmail 14305 invoked by uid 1000); 14 May 2004 06:28:40 -0000
Message-ID: <20040514062840.14304.qmail@mail.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Vitaly V. Osipov" <vitalyo@mail.ru>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: zope-cmfworkflow: not allowed to access getPermissionsText
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:28:40 +0600
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: zope-cmfworkflow
Version: 0.4.2-4
Severity: important

clicking on the portal workflow then contents tab and then on transitions tab of any workflow, and then clicking on any transition's name, like "hide" for example raises an unauthorized exception and the message is "You are not allowed to access getPermissionsText in this context"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R

Versions of packages zope-cmfworkflow depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.25     Debian configuration management sy
ii  zope-cmf                      1.3.3-1    Zope Content Management Framework 
ii  zope         						 2.6.4-1.1  Open Source Web Application Server

-- debconf information excluded

Received: (at 248960-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 04:53:54 +0000
>From vela@debian.org Mon Nov 28 20:53:54 2005
Return-path: <vela@debian.org>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([] ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EgxV4-00067o-65; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:53:54 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT4rboX029889;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:53:37 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT4rioW005398;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:53:44 +0100
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT4riLg005396;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:53:44 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 248960-done@bugs.debian.org, 250141-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: Removed
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:53:44 +0100
Message-ID: <87y838caw7.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 

zope-cmfworkflow has been removed from Debian after being orphaned for
5 months.  Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/312856> for details.

Reply to: