[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#314261: marked as done (Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?)



Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100
with message-id <87zmnzfb36.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 12:54:50 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Wed Jun 15 05:54:50 2005
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DiXPu-00054y-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:54:50 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 21FEE64D54; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A12517F89; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:54:22 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:54:22 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?
Message-ID: <20050615125422.GA13900@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-Cc: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgd-gif
Version: 1.3-5
Severity: important

libgd-gif1 has been orphaned for ages, but there are still some
packages which depend on it, so I cannot remove it right now.  Could
these packages move to some other libgd* package which we have in the
archive?

At the moment, the following packages (build-)depend on libgd-gif:
 nessus (depends)
 boot-floppies (b-d)
 gccchecker (b-d)
 nessus-core (b-d)
 png2html (b-d)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314261-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 18:06:01 +0000
>From vela@debian.org Sun Nov 20 10:06:01 2005
Return-path: <vela@debian.org>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EdtZg-0007Vp-W5; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:06:01 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAKI5nZP011494;
	Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:05:49 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAKI6L7o007489;
	Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAKI6L38007487;
	Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 143721-done@bugs.debian.org, 209700-done@bugs.debian.org,
        314261-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100
Message-ID: <87zmnzfb36.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

libgd-gif has been removed from Debian having been superseded by
libgd2.  Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/188456> for details.



Reply to: