[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#332123: marked as done (tripwire depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)



Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:02:06 -0700
with message-id <E1ENJD4-0003vz-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#332123: fixed in tripwire 2.3.1.2.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:47:06 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Oct 04 16:47:06 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EMwV0-0005hx-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:47:06 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 5C82A17F72; Tue,  4 Oct 2005 23:47:06 +0000 (GMT)
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tripwire depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
Message-Id: <20051004234706.5C82A17F72@kitenet.net>
Date: Tue,  4 Oct 2005 23:47:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: joey@kitenet.net (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tripwire

This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0

Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.

debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.

This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332123-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 00:10:42 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Wed Oct 05 17:10:42 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ENJD4-0003vz-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:02:06 -0700
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 332123-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#332123: fixed in tripwire 2.3.1.2.0-6
Message-Id: <E1ENJD4-0003vz-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:02:06 -0700
Delivered-To: 332123-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: tripwire
Source-Version: 2.3.1.2.0-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tripwire, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tripwire/tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6.diff.gz
tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tripwire/tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6.dsc
tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tripwire/tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 332123@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated tripwire package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2005 01:37:52 +0200
Source: tripwire
Binary: tripwire
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.1.2.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description: 
 tripwire   - file and directory integrity checker
Closes: 332123
Changes: 
 tripwire (2.3.1.2.0-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Use `Pre-Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0' to allow for cdebconf.
     Closes: #332123.
   * debian/config, debian/preinst, debian/postinst: Fix bashisms.
   * debian/overrides: Add override for a bashism false positive.
Files: 
 32d900b6a5e6a40eabfecc3b58329519 602 utils optional tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6.dsc
 54d26ac4596e8dd80acb2f2ff65b4302 125041 utils optional tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6.diff.gz
 f92ea0b2a600290c2a0d1f68813e7a73 1738748 utils optional tripwire_2.3.1.2.0-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDRGS7xBYivKllgY8RAnOVAKDhhS7GCErFQC0CLFr3/D0p/LCW+QCg1Gbb
n2UmlSEviHRwlateS3s0wxw=
=lG69
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: