[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#332166: marked as done (zope-backtalk depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:08:09 +0200
with message-id <87oe64bzbq.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Bug#332166: fixed in zope-backtalk 0.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:47:52 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Oct 04 16:47:52 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EMwVk-0005rY-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:47:52 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id B4AC917F72; Tue,  4 Oct 2005 23:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: zope-backtalk depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
Message-Id: <20051004234752.B4AC917F72@kitenet.net>
Date: Tue,  4 Oct 2005 23:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
From: joey@kitenet.net (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: zope-backtalk

This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0

Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.

debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.

This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.

Received: (at 332166-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 00:08:32 +0000
>From vela@debian.org Tue Oct 04 17:08:32 2005
Return-path: <vela@debian.org>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [] (UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EMwpk-0003zF-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:08:32 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j95080bV011573
	for <332166-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 02:08:00 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j95089gj014343
	for <332166-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 02:08:09 +0200
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j95089Rm014341;
	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 02:08:09 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to vela@debian.org using -f
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 332166-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#332166: fixed in zope-backtalk 0.3-7
References: <20051004234752.B4AC917F72@kitenet.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:08:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20051004234752.B4AC917F72@kitenet.net> (Joey Hess's message of
	"Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:47:52 +0000 (GMT)")
Message-ID: <87oe64bzbq.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on
Delivered-To: 332166-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: zope-backtalk
Source-Version: 0.3-7

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  5 Oct 2005 00:03:27 +0200
Source: zope-backtalk
Binary: zope-backtalk
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
 zope-backtalk - A document annotation, editing, and production system - Zope
 zope-backtalk (0.3-7) unstable; urgency=low
   * QA upload.
   * Use `Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0' to allow for cdebconf.
   * debian/watch: Add.
 a1eb6ac1ac0f90e347ae59e59127312b 591 web extra zope-backtalk_0.3-7.dsc
 5f3ccb9616e710bd32a26d0bbadaaf68 3044 web extra zope-backtalk_0.3-7.diff.gz
 06fad0dd24b7e481c6fcc9bbc89ee1e2 55012 web extra zope-backtalk_0.3-7_all.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: