[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#324236: marked as done (xbanner)

Your message dated Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <E1ELpCI-0006NW-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#324236: fixed in xbanner 1.31-24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 07:55:52 +0000
>From clytie@riverland.net.au Sun Aug 21 00:55:52 2005
Return-path: <clytie@riverland.net.au>
Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E6kgK-0004qz-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:55:52 -0700
Received: from [] (ppp198-153.lns1.adl4.internode.on.net [])
	by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7L7tn5a004293
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:25:50 +0930 (CST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99CD4B42-7B47-46E8-A1D3-6476E671EB65@riverland.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed
To: Submit <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Clytie Siddall <clytie@riverland.net.au>
Subject: xbanner
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:25:49 +0930
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,ONEWORD,
	REMOVE_REMOVAL_NEAR autolearn=no 

Package: xbanner
Version: 1.31-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch

While translating the file xbanner, I encountered the following =20
typos, which I thought you might like to eliminate in a future release.
#. Type: note
#. Description
#: ../templates:3
msgid ""
"You are attempting to remove the xbanner package.  Howevere, you have "
"altered your XDM environment to invoke xbanner.  The XDM environment =20=

will "
"cease to work if it contains references to xbanner once the xbanner =20
package "
"is removed.  You must remove the use of xbanner in the XDM =20
configuration "
"files before you can remove the xbanner package."



"cease working, if it contains references to xbanner, once the =20
xbanner package has been removed. You must delete all references to =20
xbanner ..."

is more natural language. :)

I hope this is useful. :)

submitted by:

Clytie Siddall (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / =20
nh=C3=B3m Vi=E1=BB=87t h=C3=B3a ph=E1=BA=A7n m=E1=BB=81m t=E1=BB=B1 do)

Received: (at 324236-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 21:48:03 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Sat Oct 01 14:48:03 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ELpCI-0006NW-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:47:10 -0700
From: Jose Carlos Medeiros <debian@psabs.com.br>
To: 324236-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324236: fixed in xbanner 1.31-24
Message-Id: <E1ELpCI-0006NW-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:47:10 -0700
Delivered-To: 324236-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: xbanner
Source-Version: 1.31-24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xbanner, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/x/xbanner/xbanner_1.31-24.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xbanner/xbanner_1.31-24.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xbanner/xbanner_1.31-24_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 324236@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Jose Carlos Medeiros <debian@psabs.com.br> (supplier of updated xbanner package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:36:17 -0300
Source: xbanner
Binary: xbanner
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.31-24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Medeiros <debian@psabs.com.br>
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Medeiros <debian@psabs.com.br>
 xbanner    - Beautify your X login screen
Closes: 279819 289512 324236 324237 330649
 xbanner (1.31-24) unstable; urgency=low
   * New maintainer (closes: #279819)
   * Changed xfonts-scalable from Depends to Recommends.
   * Changed all files to use files in standard directories. Policy Manual, 11.8.7.
   * Added Vietnamese po-debconf translation, thanks to Clytie Siddall
     <clytie@riverland.net.au> (closes: #324237).
   * Corrected and improved some sentences in po files, thanks to Clytie
     Siddall <clytie@riverland.net.au>. (closes: #324236)
   * Added Czech po-debconf translation, thanks to Miroslav Kure
     <kurem@upcase.inf.upol.cz>. (closes: #289512)
   * Added x-window-system as Dependence.
   * Added Swedish po-debconf translation, thanks to Daniel Nylander
     <yeager@lidkoping.net>. (closes: #330649)
 5b961c144b3f741f1c86972a3afa3fb3 633 x11 optional xbanner_1.31-24.dsc
 d777acd15c69b609227f96be6daf03da 17476 x11 optional xbanner_1.31-24.diff.gz
 8615842f8cdeda66d737d8b766ad8124 140148 x11 optional xbanner_1.31-24_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: