[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#239543: marked as done (python-gtkextra: missing dependency on icons module)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 21:02:07 -0400
with message-id <E1DSPK3-00016k-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#239543: fixed in python-gtkextra 0.22-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2004 11:09:43 +0000
>From bart@kom.auc.dk Tue Mar 23 03:09:43 2004
Return-path: <bart@kom.auc.dk>
Received: from zaz.kom.auc.dk [] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B5jmx-0004Pb-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:09:43 -0800
Received: from bart-dt.kom.auc.dk
	([] helo=[] ident=bart)
	by zaz.kom.auc.dk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #3)
	id 1B5jms-0002Qh-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:09:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Esben Haabendal Soerensen <bart@kom.auc.dk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: python-gtkextra: missing dependency on icons module
Bcc: Esben Haabendal Soerensen <bart@kom.auc.dk>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.53
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:09:37 +0100
Message-Id: <E1B5jms-0002Qh-00@zaz.kom.auc.dk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12

Package: python-gtkextra
Version: 0.22-4.2
Severity: normal

The testgtkplot.py doesn't work.

$ ./testgtkplot.py 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./testgtkplot.py", line 9, in ?
    import icons
ImportError: No module named icons

I guess there is some dependency missing, although I haven't been able
to find which package provides the icons module.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-w600

Versions of packages python-gtkextra depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                  1.2.10-9     The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                   1.2.10-16    The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libgtkextra17               0.99.17-2    A useful set of widgets for GTK+
ii  python                      2.3.3-7      An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-gtk-1.2              0.6.11-18    GTK support module for Python
ii  python-numeric              23.1-1       Numerical (matrix-oriented) Mathem
ii  xlibs                       4.3.0-6      X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information

Received: (at 239543-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 01:19:44 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sun May 01 18:19:43 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DSPb5-0003xB-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 18:19:43 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DSPK3-00016k-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 21:02:07 -0400
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 239543-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#239543: fixed in python-gtkextra 0.22-6
Message-Id: <E1DSPK3-00016k-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 21:02:07 -0400
Delivered-To: 239543-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: python-gtkextra
Source-Version: 0.22-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-gtkextra, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/p/python-gtkextra/python-gtkextra_0.22-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/python-gtkextra/python-gtkextra_0.22-6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/python-gtkextra/python-gtkextra_0.22-6_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 239543@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated python-gtkextra package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 May 2005 02:50:25 +0200
Source: python-gtkextra
Binary: python-gtkextra
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.22-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
 python-gtkextra - Python module for the GtkExtra widget set extension
Closes: 208117 239543
 python-gtkextra (0.22-6) unstable; urgency=low
   * QA upload.
   * Acknowledge NMU.  Closes: #208117.
   * Leave code examples uncompressed.  Closes: #239543.
   * Change section to python.
   * Conforms to Standards version 3.6.1.
 7b80a9efcc2fa57eb16ea0c7d9ef05f4 716 python optional python-gtkextra_0.22-6.dsc
 038a80befef5e63ed35cc05990e401df 2478 python optional python-gtkextra_0.22-6.diff.gz
 4f69ae798ce21c4d5642097ed19e0b2a 109344 python optional python-gtkextra_0.22-6_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: