[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#259830: marked as done (selectwm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)



Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:47:30 -0500
with message-id <E1CYE9y-0001aF-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#259830: fixed in selectwm 0.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2004 21:12:58 +0000
>From aj@andaco.de Fri Jul 16 14:12:58 2004
Return-path: <aj@andaco.de>
Received: from c147165.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.147.165] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bla0o-00055O-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:12:58 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bla0m-0008QU-RT; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:12:56 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>
Subject: selectwm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Message-Id: <E1Bla0m-0008QU-RT@localhost>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:12:56 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: selectwm
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'selectwm' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:

make[2]: Entering directory `/selectwm-0.3/src'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..     -s -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DLOCALEDIR=\"/selectwm-0.3/debian/tmp/usr/share/locale\" -c selectwm.c
selectwm.c: In function `list_enter':
selectwm.c:719: error: label at end of compound statement
make[2]: *** [selectwm.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/selectwm-0.3/src'
make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/selectwm-0.3'
make: *** [install] Error 2

With the attached patch 'selectwm' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/selectwm-0.3/src/selectwm.c ./src/selectwm.c
--- ../tmp-orig/selectwm-0.3/src/selectwm.c	2000-03-07 21:06:22.000000000 +0100
+++ ./src/selectwm.c	2004-07-16 23:04:07.190965636 +0200
@@ -715,7 +715,6 @@
 		case GDK_Return:
 			g_list_foreach(GTK_CLIST(widget)->selection,exec_wm,selectwm_config);
 			break;
-		default:
 		}
 }
 

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 259830-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 01:54:51 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sat Nov 27 17:54:51 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CYEH5-0005iN-00; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:54:51 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CYE9y-0001aF-00; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:47:30 -0500
From: Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de>
To: 259830-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $
Subject: Bug#259830: fixed in selectwm 0.3-4
Message-Id: <E1CYE9y-0001aF-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:47:30 -0500
Delivered-To: 259830-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: selectwm
Source-Version: 0.3-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
selectwm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

selectwm_0.3-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/selectwm/selectwm_0.3-4.diff.gz
selectwm_0.3-4.dsc
  to pool/main/s/selectwm/selectwm_0.3-4.dsc
selectwm_0.3-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/selectwm/selectwm_0.3-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 259830@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> (supplier of updated selectwm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:22:41 +0100
Source: selectwm
Binary: selectwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de>
Description: 
 selectwm   - Select a window manager at X startup
Closes: 259830
Changes: 
 selectwm (0.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix FTBFS with gcc-3.4 with patch by Andreas Jochens
     (Closes: #259830).
   * Cleaned debian/rules, upgrade to debhelper 4.
   * Minor debian/copyright fix.
   * Bump Standards-Version.
Files: 
 affcec85bdea4d2db18b9252923d67d5 668 x11 optional selectwm_0.3-4.dsc
 296f4b8e77ec1ba3320894bcfcbf6754 5382 x11 optional selectwm_0.3-4.diff.gz
 df17d295cc49fa30750bb7d4a9bb8c30 18112 x11 optional selectwm_0.3-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> -- Debian Developer

iD8DBQFBqSoRcV7WoH57iskRAqHZAJ9YZDJcjklf/QIElulb50SJXSCcWwCeLMB3
NuDWsL9a8kBRU+FZDewQtqs=
=rMPC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: