Bug#184075: marked as done (xbuffy: -fill and -center don't work in conjunction)
Your message dated Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:17:07 -0400
with message-id <E1CIuzD-0000iH-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#184075: fixed in xbuffy 3.3.bl.3-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2003 15:15:26 +0000
>From madduck@diamond.madduck.net Sun Mar 09 09:15:26 2003
Return-path: <madduck@diamond.madduck.net>
Received: from debian4.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.73.144]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18s2WL-00068q-00; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:15:25 -0600
Received: from virusscan (albatross [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 87A64252C
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:15:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from diamond.madduck.net (diamond.madduck.net [130.60.75.58])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "diamond.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 267D32169
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:15:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by diamond.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000)
id A1A448A1; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:15:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:15:23 +0100
From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xbuffy: -fill and -center don't work in conjunction
Message-ID: <20030309151523.GA31647@diamond.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable kernel 2.4.20-grsec+freeswan+preempt-diamond i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NOSPAM_INC,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: xbuffy
Version: 3.3.bl.3-16
Severity: minor
the options -fill and -center don't do what the manpage says. i can't
make a screenshot right now, but this is how xbuffy looks over here:
------------------
| ---------- |
| | prv: 0 | |
| ---------- |
| ---------- |
| | uni: 0 | |
| ---------- |
| ------------ |
| | asc: 16 | |
| ------------ |
| ---------- |
| | pfx: 0 | |
| ---------- |
| -------------- |
| | deb: 1432 | |
| -------------- |
------------------
the command line was:
/usr/bin/X11/xbuffy -geometry -0+0 -center -fill
If I omit -center, then it looks perfect.
It would rock if you could fix this!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux diamond 2.4.20-grsec+freeswan+preempt-diamond #1 SMP Fri Mar =
7 19:50:06 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.ISO-8859-15
Versions of packages xbuffy depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.21 Debian configuration managemen=
t sy
ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-3 X Athena widget set library
ii xlibs 4.2.1-3 X Window System client librari=
es
-- debconf information excluded
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
NOTE: The pgp.net keyservers and their mirrors are broken!
Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+a1qLIgvIgzMMSnURApN7AJ9Jj+I2iqj/ewNHLR8c69PlbQvOQACfSns7
gQAbJJk/ZAWHzyfhJFqogJE=
=u9Rt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184075-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2004 20:23:04 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sat Oct 16 13:23:04 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CIv4x-0002Cm-00; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:23:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CIuzD-0000iH-00; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:17:07 -0400
From: brlink@debian.org (Bernhard R. Link)
To: 184075-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#184075: fixed in xbuffy 3.3.bl.3-23
Message-Id: <E1CIuzD-0000iH-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:17:07 -0400
Delivered-To: 184075-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: xbuffy
Source-Version: 3.3.bl.3-23
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xbuffy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xbuffy/xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23.diff.gz
xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23.dsc
to pool/main/x/xbuffy/xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23.dsc
xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xbuffy/xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 184075@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bernhard R. Link <brlink@debian.org> (supplier of updated xbuffy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:53:50 +0200
Source: xbuffy
Binary: xbuffy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.3.bl.3-23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link <brlink@debian.org>
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link <brlink@debian.org>
Description:
xbuffy - Monitor mailboxes and/or newsgroups
Closes: 55466 184075 242098 259931 267671
Changes:
xbuffy (3.3.bl.3-23) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New Maintainer (Closes: #242098)
* using /usr instead of /usr/X11R6
* Tidy up a bit:
- split patches in smaler parts
- corrected some typos and missing escapes
- added many missing includes and prototypes
- removed spurious label (Closes: #259931)
* now using $HOME/.xbuffyrc if no mailboxes specified (Closes: #55466)
* changed -center and -fill slightly to leave more space (Closes: #184075)
* PO File updates:
- added the jo.po file from Hideki Yamane (Closes: #267671)
- rewrote de.po
* added checkfile mailboxtype to simple show the size of a file
* converted debian/changeloge to unicode
Files:
b5cdfcd80263ed7d8d65b6b919d5abca 684 mail optional xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23.dsc
84083f09018c7f76c32f8d81df75f421 23918 mail optional xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23.diff.gz
199f9372734a710ac461e53960b58607 38032 mail optional xbuffy_3.3.bl.3-23_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFBcYBCTrAWvKplQe4RAt2WAJ0Qz53PpCoXNJPb/o1USomCcN6u1QCghWg0
8rJ97a8a/zFUK3LA9LR4R70=
=37sY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: