[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#162836: marked as done (erroneous description in control file)

Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 01:11:58 -0700
with message-id <874qnbif8x.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2002 10:24:28 +0000
>From manu42@free.fr Mon Sep 30 05:24:27 2002
Return-path: <manu42@free.fr>
Received: from amontsouris-108-2-3-180.abo.wanadoo.fr (smtp.all-3rd.net) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17vxj0-0001so-00; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 05:24:27 -0500
Received: from arrakeen.all-3rd.net ([])
	by smtp.all-3rd.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17vxiz-0005al-00; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:24:25 +0200
Received: by arrakeen.all-3rd.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AE815DB06B; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:24:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Emmanuel le Chevoir" <manu42@free.fr>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: erroneous description in control file
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.60
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:24:23 +0200
Message-Id: <20020930102423.AE815DB06B@arrakeen.all-3rd.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: atftpd
Version: 0.6 (not installed)
Severity: minor

atftpd control file says :
    Multithreaded TFTP server implementing all options specified in
    RFCs 1350, 2090, 2347, 2348, 2349 (multicast not implemented yet).

It seems that multicast is now implemented, since v0.5. Moreover, and 
generally speaking, I think such a statement should not appear in the 
package description, but would be more appropriate in the README.Debian. 
But I might be wrong :)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux arrakeen 2.4.20-pre4-ac1 #2 SMP dim aoû 25 11:01:45 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Received: (at 162836-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 08:11:59 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 01:11:58 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BuRji-0004M3-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:11:58 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BuRji-0005dH-Ma; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:11:58 -0700
To: 147218-done@bugs.debian.org, 162836-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: Inside, I'm already SOBBING!
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 01:11:58 -0700
Message-ID: <874qnbif8x.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 162836-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

These bugs were fixed in NMU and accepted when QA took the
package at version 0.6.3.

Reply to: