[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#104835: marked as done (Build failure on hppa (at least))

Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
with message-id <87d61zo4qc.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 05:09:05 +0000
>From lamont@hp.com Sat Jul 14 00:09:05 2001
Return-path: <lamont@hp.com>
Received: from atlrel7.hp.com [::ffff:] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15LHft-00017p-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:09:05 -0500
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [])
	by atlrel7.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A4D1F5EE
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by security.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 23683)
	id 5D6DD18748; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:09:03 -0600 (MDT)
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Cc: lamont@smallone.fc.hp.com
Subject: Build failure on hppa (at least)
Message-Id: <20010714050903.5D6DD18748@security.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:09:03 -0600 (MDT)
From: lamont@hp.com (LaMont Jones)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: nitpic
Version: 0.1-8
Priority: serious

Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody.  As the
Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite
likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect.

The following build failure occured on hppa (using gcc 3.0):
See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
information, and some additional information on deciphering the sometimes
cryptic buildd database entries.

If the bug is gcc 3.0 errors, then it is quite likely reproducable on
other platforms.  With gcc 3.0, of course.

If the comment is about config.{guess,sub} then they're out of date,
see the current autotools-dev package.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux smallone 2.4.0-pa51 #44 Sun Jul 1 20:05:11 MDT 2001 parisc64 unknown

electronics/nitpic_0.1-8 by bdale-hppa [extra:uncompiled]
  Reasons for failing:
    [Category: none]
    `exit' undeclared (first use this function)

Received: (at 104835-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:02:35 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:02:35 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BuQeZ-0001yz-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BuQeZ-0005IW-5P; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
To: 104835-done@bugs.debian.org, 123697-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: The joke that kills.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
Message-ID: <87d61zo4qc.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 104835-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

These bugs were fixed by NMUs 0.1-8.3 and 0.1-8.2, accepted when the
package was taken by QA at 0.1-8.4.

Reply to: