[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#210268: marked as done (cryptoloop-source: wrong owner/group of modules)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:05 +0200
with message-id <20040422162705.GA3497@djpig.de>
and subject line Packages were removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2003 11:57:24 +0000
>From ap125@informatik.uni-rostock.de Wed Sep 10 06:57:22 2003
Return-path: <ap125@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
Received: from antivirus.uni-rostock.de [139.30.8.12] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19x3b8-0003jI-00; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:57:22 -0500
Received: from ANTIVIRUS ([139.30.8.6]) by antivirus.uni-rostock.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:57:21 +0200
Received: from mail.uni-rostock.de ([139.30.8.11]) by antivirus.uni-rostock.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:57:21 +0200
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail2.uni-rostock.de by mail2.uni-rostock.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Aug 19 2002))
 id <0HKZ00I01Y0E0J@mail.uni-rostock.de> for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed,
 10 Sep 2003 13:57:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from neo.matrix (talk052.rz.uni-rostock.de [139.30.25.52])
 by mail2.uni-rostock.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Aug 19 2002))
 with ESMTP id <0HKZ00250YJKA3@mail.uni-rostock.de>; Wed,
 10 Sep 2003 13:57:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from andreas by neo.matrix with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19x3aw-0001sk-00; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:57:10 +0200
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:57:10 +0200
From: Andreas Pakulat <ap125@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
Subject: cryptoloop-source: wrong owner/group of modules
Sender: Andreas Pakulat <ap125@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Message-id: <E19x3aw-0001sk-00@neo.matrix>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.27
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2003 11:57:21.0096 (UTC) FILETIME=[B0C24C80:01C37792]
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_30,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: cryptoloop-source
Version: 0.0.0+0.0.1-pre1-9
Severity: normal

Hi,

when using make-kpkg --rootcmd=fakeroot the owner/group of the modules
are that of the user who builts the package, not root.root. This does not
happen if I prepend make-kpkg with fakeroot instead of using --rootcmd.

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux neo 2.4.21 #1 Di Aug 12 20:16:43 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8

Versions of packages cryptoloop-source depends on:
ii  bash                          2.05b-8.1  The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  build-essential               9.6        informational list of build-essent
ii  cryptoapi-core-source         0.1.0-4    CryptoAPI core kernel module
ii  grep-dctrl                    1.102      Grep Debian package information
ii  kernel-patch-scripts          0.99.27    Scripts to help dealing with packa
ii  patch                         2.5.9-1    Apply a diff file to an original

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 210268-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 16:27:12 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Thu Apr 22 09:27:12 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BGh2e-0002Mf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:27:12 -0700
Received: from p50839807.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.152.7] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1BGh2d-0003sH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:11 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BGh2X-0002cY-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:05 +0200
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:05 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 212145-done@bugs.debian.org, 200562-done@bugs.debian.org,
	208873-done@bugs.debian.org, 208882-done@bugs.debian.org,
	209075-done@bugs.debian.org, 210268-done@bugs.debian.org,
	215435-done@bugs.debian.org, 169044-done@bugs.debian.org,
	203538-done@bugs.debian.org, 200561-done@bugs.debian.org,
	210267-done@bugs.debian.org, 211930-done@bugs.debian.org,
	169038-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Packages were removed
Message-ID: <20040422162705.GA3497@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 210268-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10

The cryptoapi-core-source and cryptoloop-source packages were
removed from Debian unstable yesterday so I close their remaining bugs.

[Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:37:55 -0400] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

cryptoapi-core-source |    0.1.0-5 | source, all
cryptoloop-source | 0.0.0+0.0.1-pre1-10 | source, all
Closed bugs: 242245

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; unmaintained, don't apply to modern kernel.
----------------------------------------------

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: