[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#167192: marked as done (epic4-script-splitfire: 'm' key is delayed by 1 to 1.5 seconds when typing, or immediately following next char entered.)

Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:03:35 +0100
with message-id <20040308210335.GH5647@djpig.de>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2002 08:03:00 +0000
>From josh.carroll@psualum.com Thu Oct 31 02:03:00 2002
Return-path: <josh.carroll@psualum.com>
Received: from deblin.org [] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 187AI8-0000Xo-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:03:00 -0600
Received: from floyd by deblin.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 187AI6-00014z-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:02:58 -0800
From: Josh Carroll <josh.carroll@psualum.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: epic4-script-splitfire: 'm' key is delayed by 1 to 1.5 seconds when typing, or immediately following next char entered.
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:02:58 -0800
Message-Id: <E187AI6-00014z-00@deblin.org>
Sender: Josh Carroll <josh.carroll@psualum.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level: **

Package: epic4-script-splitfire
Version: 1.35-3
Severity: normal

This seems to be a problem with the new epic4 in conjunction with 1.35 of the splitfire script.
When using the two, the 'm' key doesn't appear immediately after being typed. Instead, it is delayed
by 1 to 1.5 seconds after typing it, or it will show up immediately following the NEXT character
typed on the screen.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux deblin.org 2.4.19 #6 Sun Aug 25 21:11:25 PDT 2002 i686

Versions of packages epic4-script-splitfire depends on:
ii  epic4                 1: epic irc client, version 4

Received: (at 167192-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2004 21:03:45 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Mon Mar 08 13:03:45 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B0Rub-0007TH-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:03:45 -0800
Received: from pd953086c.dip.t-dialin.net ([] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1B0RuZ-0000Qc-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:03:44 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B0RuR-0007N3-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:03:35 +0100
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:03:35 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 167192-done@bugs.debian.org, 111002-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: removed
Message-ID: <20040308210335.GH5647@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 167192-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 

epic4-script-splitfire was removed from Debian unstable today. Closing
its bugs.

[Date: Mon,  8 Mar 2004 14:13:17 -0500] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

epic4-script-splitfire |     1.35-4 | source, all
Closed bugs: 196473

------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; unusable/incompatible/broken, upstream vanished, needs rewrite

Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Reply to: