[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#169773: marked as done (libct0 needs to do a Provide: freetds0)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:23 +0100
with message-id <16445.34083.805694.985720@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line closing sqlrelay reports, fixed in current version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2002 17:33:09 +0000
>From tpoindessous@thomas.intra.medisante.com Tue Nov 19 11:33:06 2002
Return-path: <tpoindessous@thomas.intra.medisante.com>
Received: from (mail.meditrans.fr) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18ECFE-0000Kj-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:33:04 -0600
Received: by thomas (Postfix, from userid 818)
	id 49640318083; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:33:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Poindessous <thomas@poindessous.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libct0 needs to do a Provide: freetds0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:33:02 +0100
Message-Id: <20021119173302.49640318083@thomas>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0

Package: libct0
Version: 0.60.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable


you have rename the freetbs0 lib to libct0, but you forgot to do a Provide:
libct0, and now sqlrelay-freetds can't be installed.

Can you add a Provide and do a upload please ?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thomas 2.4.19-686 #1 Mon Nov 18 23:59:03 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

Versions of packages libct0 depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.2.16     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-4    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  odbcinst1                     2.1.1-10   Support library and helper program

-- debconf information:
* freetds/addtoodbc: false
  freetds/newconfig: true

Received: (at 168322-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2004 05:36:45 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Wed Feb 25 21:36:45 2004
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AwECT-0003W1-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:36:45 -0800
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA27483;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i1Q5XNpB008743;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16445.34083.805694.985720@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:23 +0100
To: 168322-done@bugs.debian.org, 169773-done@bugs.debian.org,
        189840-done@bugs.debian.org, 194840-done@bugs.debian.org,
        205244-done@bugs.debian.org, 213968-done@bugs.debian.org,
        194866-done@bugs.debian.org, 175819-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: closing sqlrelay reports, fixed in current version
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 168322-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 

closing sqlrelay reports, tagged as fixed (and are fixed in current version).

Reply to: