[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#173121: marked as done (gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-1(mipsel/unstable): out of date config.guess/config.sub)



Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:02:13 -0500
with message-id <E18XbCH-0002ys-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#173121: fixed in gnome-vfs-extras2 0.99.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 02:17:29 +0000
>From rmurray@cyberhqz.com Sat Dec 14 20:17:29 2002
Return-path: <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>
Received: from h24-83-208-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.83.208.253] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18NOLQ-0004z3-00; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:17:29 -0600
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 98C5554004; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 18:17:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 18:17:27 -0800
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-1(mipsel/unstable): out of date config.guess/config.sub
Message-ID: <20021215021727.GD14868@cyberhqz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: rmurray@cyberhqz.com (Ryan Murray)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=5.0
	tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnome-vfs-extras2
Version: 0.99.6.1-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-1 on repeat.rfc822.org by sbuild/mipsel 1.169
> Build started at 20021214-2335

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), gettext, libgnomevfs2-dev (>= 2.0.2-1), librio500-dev (>= 0.8.1) [i386 powerpc]

[...]

> /bin/uname -X     = 
> 
> hostinfo               = 
> /bin/universe          = 
> /usr/bin/arch -k       = 
> /bin/arch              = mips
> /usr/bin/oslevel       = 
> /usr/convex/getsysinfo = 
> 
> UNAME_MACHINE = mips
> UNAME_RELEASE = 2.4.20-pre6
> UNAME_SYSTEM  = Linux
> UNAME_VERSION = #2 Tue Oct 22 12:27:33 CEST 2002
> configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipsel&pkg=gnome-vfs-extras2&ver=0.99.6.1-1

The versions of config.guess and config.sub in this source package are too old
to correctly support the Debian mips and mipsel architectures.  A version is
needed from this year, which is available in the autotools-dev packages that
are in current woody, sarge, and sid.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173121-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2003 06:06:18 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sun Jan 12 00:06:18 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18XbGE-0002Tt-00; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:06:18 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18XbCH-0002ys-00; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:02:13 -0500
From: Joe Drew <drew@debian.org>
To: 173121-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $
Subject: Bug#173121: fixed in gnome-vfs-extras2 0.99.6.1-2
Message-Id: <E18XbCH-0002ys-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:02:13 -0500
Delivered-To: 173121-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-vfs-extras2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs-extras2/gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2.diff.gz
gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs-extras2/gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2.dsc
gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs-extras2/gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 173121@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joe Drew <drew@debian.org> (supplier of updated gnome-vfs-extras2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:42:17 -0500
Source: gnome-vfs-extras2
Binary: gnome-vfs-extras2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99.6.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joe Drew <drew@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joe Drew <drew@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnome-vfs-extras2 - gnome-vfs modules, includes SMB and Rio500 support
Closes: 162409 173121
Changes: 
 gnome-vfs-extras2 (0.99.6.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Adopted (Closes: Bug#162409)
   * Update config.{guess, sub} for mips(el) goodness (Closes: Bug#173121)
Files: 
 e09263c793ad43c8c7933c2f8ced1c28 681 x11 optional gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2.dsc
 b11c4dd0a1602f2e8da938763c43d4dd 13858 x11 optional gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2.diff.gz
 4ad5d7571b212b0fce08a7556e501fad 240672 x11 optional gnome-vfs-extras2_0.99.6.1-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+IQIXo7ginaV9i/cRAuu3AJ0XxctwLMWtwXfY+Zuc1v1gUcgq5gCdG0aO
IUPOQmHRijJV8KZKzXe8UAo=
=kYRx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: