[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166700: marked as done (ssh2: Debian ssh2 is too old. Should be upgraded or removed.)



Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:28:59 +0100
with message-id <20021229102859.GA23077@c102-tbm1.uibk.ac.at>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 00:22:17 +0000
>From toomim@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu Sun Oct 27 18:22:17 2002
Return-path: <toomim@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu>
Received: from front1.mail.megapathdsl.net [66.80.60.31] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 185xfd-0004ps-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:22:17 -0600
Received: from [216.36.77.18] (HELO cheeseskin)
  by front1.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0)
  with ESMTP id 48086188 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:22:12 -0800
Received: from toomim by cheeseskin with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 185ycb-0001Da-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:23:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Toomim <toomim@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ssh2: Debian ssh2 is too old.  Should be upgraded or removed.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:23:13 -0800
Message-Id: <E185ycb-0001Da-00@cheeseskin>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ssh2
Version: 2.0.13-7
Severity: important
Tags: security

Debian's version of SSH's ssh (called the "ssh2" package for some reason) is
version 2.0.13-7.  Upstream is at version 3.2.0.

This is no good. 2.0.13-7 is really buggy, and numerous security flaws have
been fixed since it came out. It's detrimental to include this package in
Debian, with its current state. It should either be upgraded to the latest
upstream, or removed entirely.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cheeseskin 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

Versions of packages ssh2 depends on:
ii  libc6                    2.3.1-3         GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  libncurses5              5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal =
hand
ii  xlibs                    4.2.1-3         X Window System client librari=
es
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.1.4-6       compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166700-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2002 10:29:05 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Dec 29 04:29:02 2002
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from c102-tbm1.uibk.ac.at [138.232.26.51] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Sago-0001JJ-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 04:29:02 -0600
Received: by c102-tbm1.uibk.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C082111A5B1; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:28:59 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:28:59 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 166700-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <20021229102859.GA23077@c102-tbm1.uibk.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 166700-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
	tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

The package has been removed now.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com



Reply to: